WebMar 10, 1992 · See Commonwealth v. Newman, 534 Pa. 424, 633 A.2d 1069 (1993). The Appellant argues that the "bodily injury or violence" exception to the rule that spouses were incompetent to testify against each other, found in this section, did not affect the rule stated in section 5914 that spouses are incompetent to testify about confidential communications. WebMar 8, 1993 · Commonwealth v. Pierce, 515 Pa. 153, 527 A.2d 973 (1987). This court has held that "where it is clear that allegations of ineffectiveness are baseless or meritless …
Com. v. Perry :: 1989 :: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Decisions ...
Web517 Pa. 89 (1987) 534 A.2d 1053. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. C.S., Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 12, 1987. Decided … WebFenton v. Board of Probation and Parole, 532 A.2d 1223 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1987). Prior inconsistent statements of the witnesses at a parole hearing for a technical violation under this section could be used as substantive evidence against the parolee under the holdings of Commonwealth v. Brady, 507 A.2d 66 (Pa. 1986), Wilson v. toeic 470点 単語数
Commonwealth v. Hancharik, 534 Pa. 435 - Casetext
WebSep 21, 1992 · Commonwealth v. Freeman, supra; Commonwealth v. Ellis, 349 Pa. 402, 37 A.2d 504 (1944); Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 208 Pa. Super. 366, 222 A.2d 474 (1966). In the case at bar the only fact from which an intent to steal could possibly be inferred is appellant's unlawful entry into the apartment. WebSee this Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Wright, 508 Pa. 25, 494 A.2d 354 (1985), upholding the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Act, 42 P.C.S. § 9712, which requires imposition of a minimum sentence of five years' total confinement upon persons found to have been in visible possession of a firearm during the commission of certain felonies. WebApr 6, 2024 · Commonwealth v. Miller, 660 A.2d 123 (Pa. Super. 1995) (non-precedential decision), appeal denied, 666 A.2d 1053 (Pa. 1995). On October 28, 1998, Miller filed his first PCRA petition. Following the appointment of counsel and a hearing, the PCRA court dismissed the petition as untimely filed, and establishing no time-bar exception. On … toeic 465点